🔗 Share this article

A collective of those harmed during the state-led crackdown amid the 2022 "Women, Life, Freedom" protests has filed a landmark legal case accusing forty identified Iranian officials of suspected human rights violations.

Legal Action Initiated in the Argentinian System

The application for a legal inquiry to be commenced was lodged within the Argentinian legal system. This action was made by a coalition assisted by a human rights legal group. Argentina's courts are recognized for accommodating international law complaints.

The filing asserts that the reaction from state security apparatus to the protests entailed "firing live ammunition, marker guns, harmful pellets not intended for close-range use, and additional ammunition at protesters." The case further states arbitrary roundups, torture in detention, and death sentences of protesters that reportedly continue to this day.

Confidential Names

Specific officers across the spectrum of Iran's security services have been named in the complaint, but their names are currently being kept confidential.

Victim Testimonies Drive the Case

One of the individuals behind the case, based in Britain Mahsa Piraei, explained that the purpose "goes beyond retribution in a private capacity, but responsibility and transparency." Her parent, Minoo Majidi, 62 years old, was fatally shot in late 2022. Forensic analysis indicated more than 167 steel projectiles had been fired into her back at extremely close proximity. She had been attending a gathering concerning the killing of Mahsa Amini, a youthful Kurdish woman who was killed while detained.

Piraei, one of Majidi's three children, was based abroad at the period of her mother's violent demise. She went back to Iran at great risk to visit her grave. Her sibling Roya posted a picture of herself by their resting place with her hair shaved on a personal social media account. A friend circulated the image, which went viral, subsequently compelling Roya to seek exile for Turkey.

Piraei remarked: "Via official complaints and evidence the goal is to preserve evidence, name crimes and stop the disappearance." She characterized her loss as "part of a pattern but part of a common procedure."

Other Litigants Are Those Shot in the Eye

The other two claimants who have come forward are Kowsar Eftekhari and Mersedeh Shahinkar, both survivors of blinding at close range by marker guns.

Eftekhari, a young student, was struck in the right eye in October 2022. She had been protesting for an extended period, observing fellow demonstrators being shot with lethal fire and being struck herself with electronic batons. During a demonstration on 12 October, she was at a demonstration near a educational institution when a plainclothes officer struck her with numerous paintballs from a range of about a yard. He then is said to have fired at her face when she did not comply with his command to scatter. A footage of the incident depicting injuries from her eye went viral, and she was subsequently granted asylum in Germany.

Shahinkar, aged 38 when assaulted on 18 October, only realized what had happened when she sensed something wet on her face. Fellow protesters warned her not to enter an ambulance for fear of being transported to a detention center. When she eventually got to a medical clinic, a staff member instructed her to go away because they did not help demonstrators. A medical professional assessed her and directed her to a medical center, where Shahinkar claimed a rock had accidentally damaged her vision so she would not be refused care. She posted photos of her injuries online, and in the new year, plainclothes officers came for her, prompting her to flee Iran. She later collected a renowned international award as a symbol of the campaign.

International Law Principle Creates Avenue for Case

The individuals pursuing the legal probe state that the filing is not viewed just as a legal complaint with no hope of a concrete result. The concept permits allegations to be investigated in a third country even if the crime did not occur in that jurisdiction and the suspect is not located there. Argentina has notably open laws on such cases in the world.

The principle of international justice has historically led to numerous sentences and the launch of investigations covering offenses committed in numerous nations. Cases are presently being pursued in multiple jurisdictions.

As the request is only for a judicial probe, and this is not a case for damages, there is no claim by the litigants for monetary compensation. This case would not represent the first instance against Iranian authorities initiated in Argentina.