🔗 Share this article BBC Departures Labeled as Inside 'Takeover' by Former Media Executive The recent departures of the BBC's chief executive and its news chief over allegations of partiality have been portrayed as an internal "takeover" by a ex media executive. David Yelland, who formerly edited the Sun publication from 1998 to 2003, claimed during a broadcast that the departures of Tim Davie and Deborah Turness came after methodical weakening by individuals close to the corporation's leadership over an prolonged timeframe. "It was a coup, and more serious than that, it was an internal operation. There were people within the organization, extremely connected to the board ... on the board, who have methodically undermined Tim Davie and his executive staff over a duration of [time] and this has been continuing for a long time. What transpired yesterday didn't just happen in isolation," the former editor remarked. Governance Breakdown Highlighted "What has transpired here is there was a failure of leadership. I don't blame the chairman [Samir Shah] as an person, but the role of the leader of any institution, a company – encompassing the BBC – is to maintain their CEO, their senior executive, in role or dismiss them. And that has failed to happen, because Tim Davie was not dismissed. He resigned and so there was, that is the essence of, a breakdown of governance." Background of Latest Controversy The departures on Sunday followed period of criticism from the U.S. administration and conservative pundits in the UK that were triggered by claims reported by the Daily Telegraph. The newspaper reported a unauthorized account of the conclusions of a previous outside consultant to its editorial guidelines panel, Michael Prescott, who left his role during the summer. He had questioned the editing of a speech by Donald Trump in an edition of Panorama, which he claimed made it seem that Trump had supported the US Capitol attack. Two sections of the speech that were combined together were spoken an sixty minutes apart, and the edit failed to mention that Trump had additionally said he desired his supporters to protest peacefully. Inside Responses and External Viewpoints Yelland's comments mirror a mood of concern described by insiders within BBC News on Sunday night, with one saying: "It feels like a coup. This represents the result of a effort by political enemies of the BBC." Others, including Sky's former political editor Adam Boulton, have stated the general perception that Trump encouraged the insurrection was essentially true. It is common practice to edit together sections of a long address to accurately summarize it. Handover Plans and Organizational Effect Davie stated his exit would wouldn't be immediate and that he was "working through" scheduling to guarantee an "orderly transition" over the following months. Turness stated dispute around the Panorama edit had "reached a stage where it is causing damage to the BBC – an institution that I love." On Monday, the BBC journalist Nick Robinson revealed there had been inaction at the highest levels of the BBC because, while its experienced journalists desired to express regret for the production mistake – but maintain there was "no plan to deceive" the viewers – the politically appointed directors preferred to take additional steps. Governmental Response and Broader Context Shah is expected to apologize on Monday to the Parliament's cultural affairs panel, and to provide additional details on the Panorama program in his reply to the committee, which had asked how he would address the concerns. Commenting after the resignations, the government minister Louise Sandher-Jones rejected suggestions the BBC was systematically partial. The veterans minister stated Sky News: "When you examine the vast range of domestic issues, local issues, global affairs, that it has to cover, I think its output is highly trusted. When I converse with people who've got very strongly held opinions on those, they're continuing using the BBC for much of their news, it's forming their views on this."